Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content
Fig. 6 | Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition

Fig. 6

From: The role of age in the physiological adaptations and psychological responses in bikini-physique competitor contest preparation: a case series

Fig. 6

The time-course analysis of 20-week contest preparation with accompanying mean average (mean ± SEM; 95% CI) comparison between the BC and MBC on a) bone mineral content (BMC), and b) bone mineral density (BMD). The BC showed to have a slightly higher mean BMC (2.24 ± .003; 95% CI: 2.23–2.25 kg) compared to the MBC (2.10 ± .009; 95% CI: 2.07–2.12 kg). The BC and MBC showed to have similar mean BMD measures (1.11 ± .007; 95% CI: 1.09–1.13 g⋅cm− 2 vs 1.11 ± .006; 95% CI: 1.09–1.13 g⋅cm− 2). The dashed red line denotes the competition

Back to article page

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition

ISSN: 1550-2783

Contact us